ajellis
19th April 2006, 09:07 AM
David,
it has occurred to me that it might be very well worthwhile to enable tradesim to test a method of ranking trades signalled on a given day in preferential order. This would enable testing of preferential orders in the case of multiple signals being given on one day.
For example, if a trading system provided entry signals for 10 stocks, tradesim could rank them in preferential order by a defined method, such as lowest priced first through to highest price last.
At present, when faced with a choice of 10 possible trades on a given day, Tradesim chooses randomly.
Other suggestions for preferential order are:
highest volume first, lowest volume last
lowest risk (difference between close and initial stop) first, highest last
This would enable a portfolio methodology to be tested without randomness except where two or more stocks were equal in price, volume, trade risk etc.
It may even be possible to choose based on a Relative Strength rating between each candidate and the market index.
Possible?
regards
Andrew
it has occurred to me that it might be very well worthwhile to enable tradesim to test a method of ranking trades signalled on a given day in preferential order. This would enable testing of preferential orders in the case of multiple signals being given on one day.
For example, if a trading system provided entry signals for 10 stocks, tradesim could rank them in preferential order by a defined method, such as lowest priced first through to highest price last.
At present, when faced with a choice of 10 possible trades on a given day, Tradesim chooses randomly.
Other suggestions for preferential order are:
highest volume first, lowest volume last
lowest risk (difference between close and initial stop) first, highest last
This would enable a portfolio methodology to be tested without randomness except where two or more stocks were equal in price, volume, trade risk etc.
It may even be possible to choose based on a Relative Strength rating between each candidate and the market index.
Possible?
regards
Andrew